Skip to main content

Thomas Hammer French Roast Coffee


For the final installment of the Hammer Coffee tasting, regarding the three attributes graphed on their packaging, I try Thomas Hammer’s French Roast Coffee. As stated in my previous article (post), French Roast is graphed as having maximum roast and body with minimal acidity. To understand the three attributes of tasting coffee, roast, body, and acidity, I will compare Hammer’s French Roast with their Signature Blend. Hammer’s Signature Blend graphs roast, body, and acidity as moderate.

Upon opening the bag of Hammer’s French Roast, I am pleasantly surprised with a very rich coffee smell. There is nothing nutty or any dryness suggestive about it. In my opinion, I could say nothing about the roast from its scent. It is somewhat like moist soil in a cedar grove.

The taste of Hammer’s French Roast is very smoky. Like the tasting notes, it has a smoky, cedar aura. It does remind me of cedar burning on a campfire. When drinking my second cup, with sweetener added, I get a bold new flavor. Again, like the notes, the flavor has a walnut taste that sets broadly on my tongue. While my research suggests a possible bitterness in the dark roast, I sense it as flatter. While the Signature Blend was exceptionally smooth, the French Roast has smoothness and broader flavor.

The body of the Hammer French Roast is exceedingly present. It has weight on the tongue and cheeks and does not compromise with a brief after taste. Its flavor, in my first and second cups, coats my mouth and allows me to relish the beans and their morning brewed alchemy. Unlike the Signature Blend, the French Roast has a heavier presence. It is a richer brew that delivers a stronger coffee flavor without being contemporary.

Acidity, in my opinion, seems very subjective. I detected nothing acidic about Hammer’s French Roast. It was a stretch for me to say there was anything acidic about their signature blend. Both these coffees, in my experience, are exceptional products, and I believe they have no equals. My research and experimentation of these Hammer Coffees have contradicted some of my own tasting theories and have led me to better understanding of my own taste conceptions. I suggest that people buy these products and experiment with them. While peoples’ experiences are relative, learning is something we can all do. Coffee should be a shared experience. I wish you all a lucrative and enjoyable coffee tasting experience and hope this series of posts has helped.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peet's Light Roast, Sun Catcher Coffee

For this Coffee tasting I tried Peet’s, light roast, Sun Catcher coffee. I often search for coffees that are more distinctive than contemporary, familiar flavors. This coffee seems to be commercially evasive (IMO). The package reads, “strawberry jam, citrus, and honeysuckle.” When I open the gourmet pouch and sniff, I shove my nose in to make sure I’m getting a good smell. The smell is good and unique. I think the honeysuckle and jam are new with the coffee scent; they create something I can’t describe. I brew the coffee and fill my cup. When I taste it unsweetened, I get a good, strong, coffee flavor with a light presence on my tongue. There is something going on here. The back flavor of citrus I have become familiar with, it seems to be a redeeming quality in the gourmet coffee market. The honeysuckle piques my interest, it is not strong or defining, but it is there. I like it. Strawberry jam? I don’t taste it. There does seem to be a hint at sweetness. There seems to be an abstracte...

Stumptown, Holler Mountain Ground Coffee

Stumptown, Holler Mountain Coffee is quoted on the package as a signature blend. The smell of this moderately ground coffee leaves me curious. On my first taste of this coffee, it seems nothing like the flavors promoted on the package: coffee beans, caramel, hazelnut, and citrus. There is something complex going on with the flavor of this coffee. I had to let it rest on my whole tongue so all my taste buds could inform my understanding of a coffee maker’s experienced pallet. The flavors prompted on the package are not used to add flavor directly but are used to create a unique experience regarding how coffee tactilely reacts in the consumer’s mouth. There is something very blue-collar about this coffee, but at the same time, it transcends to something gourmet. With effort, there is a caramel buffer at the sides of the tongue, a distant nuttiness with the coffee, and a late, back end of citrus without the acidity. This coffee reminds me of a blue-collar ideal of working in the Southwest...

Starbucks' Cinnamon Dolce Coffee

The coffee tasted for this critique is Starbucks’ Cinnamon Dolce. On opening the bag, the smell is pleasant. There is a smell of cinnamon that saturates the coffee aroma or the beans. Looking at the coffee, it has a medium grind. It is not as course as say, generic, mass produced, coffee in bulk plastic containers. When I pour water over it, the room is filled with an appetizing vapor that makes the bagels smell like a new delicacy. It is chocolate bagels with cinnamon coffee. I drink my first cup with no sweetener. There is a lack of coarseness or bite that is familiar with generic coffee. Such a bite is often the case with convenience store coffees, but this cinnamon dolce has no harshness or bite. This is the case with special blends or the individual bags that people can buy at the grocery store. They are aside on the shelves from the coffees in bulk plastic containers. Starbucks’ Cinnamon Dolce, in my opinion, is a very good coffee. It has an organic cinnamon flavor with a smooth,...